Improvement of Photovoltaic System Performance Base on M-Shape Orientation

In this study, a comparison was made between Traditional Structure and M-Shape Structure. The studies on these systems were as follows: α = 10 ° belongs to Traditional, set the angle β = β '= 5 ° of M-Shape, Solar sorting of Traditional system Latitude angle Latitude M-Shape system M-Shape sorting. Through the
study of this project obtained results such as traditional sorting received 1104kW and sorted by M-Shape received 1392kW, and we see the comparison of the two systems as a result M-Shape is more profitable. Traditional gains up to 228kW, about 26.086% in 1 year. For the 30-year study, the results of Saved CO2 of Traditional Saved CO2 30905.658 tons and M-Shape Saved CO2 38353.151 tons for M-Shape Saved CO2 system were more than Traditional up to 7447.493 tons, about 24.097%. Then study the production price for both systems run for 30 years, with both systems operating between 5 to 6 years with the same depreciation cost up to 30 years Traditional selling power 2074473,293 $ And M-Shape sold $ 2611405,282 more than Traditional, up to $ 536931.988, about 25.88%.