Title | Comparison of Cost Effectiveness between Diaphragm Wall and Contiguous Bored Pile Wall |
Author(s) | Hor Sok Eng |
Status | 71 views, 1 downloads Download |
Keywords | |
Abstract | The use of construction as a type of Diaphragm wall is designed to build retaining walls, buildings that are built deep into the ground, or below that encounters excessive water problems that cause complications during construction. That is, this type of wall is most suitable for all types of soil and uses the fast time during construction. A diaphragm wall is a type of wall that not only helps to withstand the pressure of the soil, also can also withstand water In addition, this type of wall is permanently used as a construction The use of retaining walls as a type of Contiguous Bored Pile is also popular because this type of wall is rich in tools, easy to build, and low cost. On the other hand, this type of wall is best suited for impermeable clay, but this type of wall is often difficult to deal with the permeable soil layer or very deep construction. This type of wall needs to build another wall to be able to use, and construction takes a long time. As a result, if the wall is deep, the soil is the permeable soil layer, there is a lot of complex construction around and the construction time is fast, you should choose the diaphragm wall for your construction because its construction method is safes method during construction with a fast time and more economical |
Adviser(s) | Hor Sok Eng |
Institution | National Polytechnic Institute of Cambodia |
Faculty | Graduate School, m.civil |
Published Date | 2021 |
Pages | 134 |
Rights | ©2020 All Rights Reserved. |
Recommended Citation | Hor Sok Eng. Comparison of Cost Effectiveness between Diaphragm Wall and Contiguous Bored Pile Wall. m.civil. NPIC Scientific Publication, 2021. |